بررسی ابعاد معماری بیوفیلیک در باغ های ایرانی با نظریه «ارزش بیوفیلی» کلرت؛ موردپژوهی: باغ شاهزاده ماهان

Investigating the dimensions of biophilic architecture in Iranian gardens with Kellert's value of biophilic theory; Case Study: Shahazadeh Mahan Garden

نویسندگان :

معین فیروزی¹،

نویسندگان لاتین :

Moein Firozy¹،
دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد معماری، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.(مسئول)¹
تعداد صفحات : 17
چکیده :

در ده سال گذشته، طبیعت و طراحی بیوفیلیک، توجه گسترده ای را در معماری به ویژه در پاسخ به چالش های رو به رشد محیطی به خود جلب کرده و برای آن چهارچوب های متفاوتی تعریف شده است. «استفان آر. کلرت»، اولین پژوهشگری بود که به تعریف چهارچوبی جامع برای طراحی بیوفیلیک در حوزه معماری پرداخت که با بکارگیری از این اصول ساختمان هایی با رویکرد بیوفلیک می توان احداث کرد؛ حال با این مسئله رو به رو می شویم که آیا معماری و ساختمان های بیوفیلیک فقط از ده سال گذشته بوجود آمده و یا اصولی که امروزه به ساختمان ها بیوفیلیک مربوط می شود، در معماری و بناهای گذشتگان وجود داشته است؟ روش تحقیق مقاله حاضر توصیفی- تحلیلی و پیمایشی بصورت میدانی است که با تعریف چگونگی پدید آمدن معماری بیوفلیک و بررسی چهارچوب های تعریف شده آن توسط کلرت پرداخته و سپس با مطالعه ویژگی های باغ شاهزاده ماهان و تطبیق آن با اصول تعریف شده، این نتیجه حاصل شده که معماری بیوفلیک پدیده ای تازه ابداع شده ای نیست و در اصول طراحی بناهای گذشگان وجود داشته است و درنهایت می توان از بیوفیلیک به عنوان عنصری نام برد که در طول تاریخ وجود داشته و بشر در دهه گذشته فقط توانسته بیوفیلیک را در چهارچوبی جامع را مکتوب کند.

چکیده انگلیسی :

In the last ten years, nature and biophilic design have attracted wide attention in architecture, especially in response to growing environmental challenges, and different frameworks have been defined for it. Stephen R. Kellert", was the first researcher to define a comprehensive framework for biophilic design in the field of architecture, which can be used to build buildings with a biophilic approach; Now we are faced with the issue of whether architecture and biophilic buildings have emerged only in the last ten years or the principles that are related to biophilic buildings today existed in the architecture and buildings of the past? The research method of this article is descriptive-analytical and survey in the form of a field survey, which is defined by the definition of the emergence of bioflake architecture and the examination of its defined frameworks by Kellert, and then by studying the characteristics of Prince Mahan's garden and matching it with the defined principles, this The result is that biophilic architecture is not a newly invented phenomenon and has existed in the design principles of past buildings, and finally, biophilic can be mentioned as an element that has existed throughout history and mankind has only been able to Write biophilic in a comprehensive framework.

موضوع : معماری
کلمات کلیدی : بیوفیلیک، بیوفیلیا، معماری بیوفیلیک، باغ شاهزاده ماهان.
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: biophilic, biophilia, biophilic architecture, Prince Mahan garden.
مراجع :
1. Abbasalizadeh Rezakolai, S., D. Samadi and M. Tabatabaian. 2015. Analysis of Persian gardens using Kaplan’s landscape preference theory: Case study: Fin Garden, Shahzadeh Garden, Eram Garden and Eli-Goli Garden. Intl. J. Architectural Eng. Urban Planning. 25:6–20 2. Abdelaal, M.S., Soebarto, V.,2019. Biophilia and Salutogenesis as restorative design approaches in healthcare architecture. Architect. Sci. Rev. 62, 195_205. 3. Abdelaal, M.S., 2019. Biophilic campus: an emerging planning approach for a sustainable innovation-conducive university. J. Clean. Prod. 215, 1445_1456. 4. Appleton, J., 1975. The Experience of Landscape. John Wiley & Sons. 5. Bachari, H. 2012. Bagh-e-Shahzadeh: The Prince’s Garden at Mahan. 23 Aug. 2019. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v5sjIi2A7a9F0 6. Beck, U., 1999. World risk society as cosmopolitan society? Ecological questions in a framework of manufactured uncertainties. In: World Risk Society. Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 19_23. 7. Bildar Mahani, Amin. 2013. Interview; A fertile landscape in Prince Mahan's garden. September 15, 2013 8. Browning, W., Ryan, C., Clancy, J., 2014. 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health & Well-Being in the Built Environment. Terrapin Bright Green,LLC., New York. 9. Browning, W.D., Ryan, C.O., 2020. What is biophilia and what does it mean for buildings and spaces? Nature Inside: A Biophilic Design Guide. RIBA Publishing, pp. 1_5. 10. Cramer, J.S., Browning, W.D., 2008. Transforming building practices through biophilic design. In: Biophilic Design: the Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life, pp. 335_346 11. Heerwagen, J.H., Hase, B., 2001. Building biophilia: connecting people to nature in building design. Environ. Des. Constr. 3, 12. 30_36. 13. Hidalgo, M.C., Herna´ndez, B.,2001. Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions. J. Environ. Psychol. 273_281 14. Hildebrand, G., 2008. Biophilic architectural space. In: Biophilic Design: the Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life, pp. 263_275. 15. Hildebrand, G., 1999. Origins of Architectural Pleasure. University of California Press. 16. Hunter, P.R., MacDonald, A.M., Carter, R.C., 2010. Water supply and health. PLoS Med. 7. 17. Joye, Y., 2007. Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: the case of biophilic architecture. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 11, 305_328. 18. Kaplan, S., 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 15, 169_182. 19. Kellert, S.R., 2018. Nature by Design: The Practice of Biophilic Design. Yale University Press. 20. Kellert, S.R., 2008a. Biophilia. In: Jørgensen, S.E., Fath, B.D. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Ecology, pp. 462_466. Elsevier Science. 21. Kellert, S.R., 2008b. Dimensions, elements, and attributes of biophilic design. In: Biophilic Design: the Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life, pp. 3_19. 22. Kellert, S.R., 2005. Building for Life: Designing and Understanding the Human-Nature Connection. Island Press, Washington. 23. Kellert, S.R., Calabrese, E.F., 2015. The Practice of Biophilic Design. Available online at: http://www.biophilic-design.com. 24. Kellert, S.R., Heerwagen, J.H., Mador, M.L., 2008. Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life.John Wiley & Sons. 25. Khalil Nejad, Mohammad. 2013; Bagh Nazar magazine; Forming platforms and features of fruitful landscape in Iranian garden 26. Norberg – Schulz,C.(2009). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture . translated to farsi by Shirazi ,M.R. 27. Orians, G.H., Heerwagen, J.H 1992. Evolved responses to landscapes. In: The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, pp. 555_580. 28. Park, S.J., Lee, H.C., 2019. Spatial design of childcare facilities based on biophilic design patterns. Sustain 11, 1_15. 29. Ryan, C.O., Browning, W.D., Clancy, J.O., Andrews, S.L., Kallianpurkar, N.B., 2014. Biophilic design patterns: emerging nature-based parameters for health and well-being in the built environment. Archnet-IJAR 8, 62_76. 30. Ulrich, R.S., 1983. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. Hum. Behav. Environ. 6, 85_125. 31. Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A., Zelson, M., 1991. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 11, 201_230. 32. Wilson, A., 2008. Biophilia in practice: buildings that connect people with nature. In: Biophilic Design: the Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life, pp. 325_333. 33. Wilson, E.O., 1984. Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species. MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

---

تعداد بازدید از مقاله : 1410
تعداد دانلود فایل : 150